Artificial Intelligence is going to do a lot of human work. Some work, like writing 100-word introduction texts for restaurants is said to be common before, but now disappeared in last few years because of AI. Developers of AI want it to be able to fulfill all human tasks.
So I would say:
You do not want to do only routine job, because in future, AI might ask less money and managing power than you. You want to learn something, where humans use their creativity and intuitive understanding of something deeper.
I think that in ability to check the facts humans are still better - AI is often wrong and still bad at mathematics, but there are not many reasons why computers should be bad in mathematics.
Probably for creative tasks, which need introspection on information and finding the qualities, not quantities, humans are better.
What happens to world, when small group of people can use AI for all the life-essential tasks, and they do not need masses - does it happen that some small group would start to control all the resources, and not need the involvement of people very much?
This is a very deep question - after the AI, how we need to develop humans so that they are needed, not just sometimes cheaper for the work. We need to go through humanity, all the jobs you can make AI to do, serious reasons where humans could be better - we know, not in Chess, or Go, but maybe in helping the Chess and Go machines in something? Maybe if the human learns everything from a chess-machine, they are still better or at least competitive?
We also need AI's to be accessible: AI can work through a lot of content - but maybe, if humans work through all the things what AI discovered, patterns etc., then with this information - they can achieve something creative what AI's miss? Maybe, your AI reads million pages of text in a day - but it gives you so short and general introduction to the generalization it's able to make, that you can see if it lacks something, and you can work with this with all human potential?
We know that humans can sense infinities, see future, and have many extraordinary skills - maybe they are all needed to beat computers?
Also, we know that when AI takes over the work of factories, it's very effective - but I doubt it's effective against handcrafting; maybe if you work with machines and grow plants, a machine completely overtakes your work - but if you grow them with hands and love, many people would want your quality. I don't know whether AI can put love into the product, but I suppose there is nothing repeatable or algorithmical about this, it cannot be solved with a matrix - probably you use your higher senses and do something irrational, unrepeated, which, a bit like digits of PI cannot be put into one ultimate formulae. So maybe to cope with AI, we need to learn high-quality manual production - so that our AI would work with machines, but we have small garden for ourselves to work with hands and spirit, and produce better health ..given that AI takes the factory work anyway - probably humans would be much better.
So maybe the Natural Lifestyle is an answer? Maybe the computers cannot beat us in that?